1st Additional Sizewell C Consultation – 18 November to 18 December 2020
The documents for the first additional Sizewell C Post-application Consultation were released by SZC Co. on the 18th November 2020 with a closing date of the 18th December 2020.
The formal response of the Parish Council is below along with a Foreword and Executive Summary:
Sizewell C Planning Inspectorate Relevant Representation – September 2020
The Parish Council have submitted a Relevant Representation that largely focuses on the potential impacts (direct and indirect) that the Sizewell C development as proposed might have on KcC; the ecology of the Parish, residents, businesses and visitors – during both construction and subsequent operation.
Sizewell C Stage 4 Consultation – 18 July to 27 September 2019
The documents for the Sizewell C Stage 4 Pre-application Consultation were released by EDF on the 18th July 2019. Due to their size these documents are unable to be loaded onto the website. Hard copies of both the summary and full consultation document are available for public inspection by request.
The formal response of the Parish Council to the Stage 4 Pre-application Consultation on Sizewell C is below:
Sizewell C EIA Scoping Opinion
The Sizewell C Environmental Impact Analysis Scoping Opinion was commented on by the Parish Council in their role as a statutory consultee.
The Parish Council are also making available below the Joint response of the District and County Councils to the EIA Scoping Opinion as they too hold Statutory Consultee status.
Sizewell C Stage 3 Consultation – ended on 29th March 2019
The formal response of the Parish Council to the Stage 3 Pre-application Consultation on Sizewell C is below and comprises separately the Executive Summary, Detailed Response and Appendices A to H:
Appendix F, a 2mb file describes the ‘verbatim comments’ of residents collected during March 2019 following the public meeting in February. It is available here to view or download and will open in a new window.
Appendix H, a 158kb file is a copy of a reply from the Department of Transport in response to a question for the Parish Council regarding the traffic analysis methodology employed by EDF Energy. It is available here and will open in a new window
As implied in the previous paragraphs, the Parish Council undertook ‘door drop questionnaire’ research during the consultation. The results are summarised in the following documents.
Sizewell C Stage 2 Consultation – January 2017
The formal response of the Parish Council to the Stage 2 Pre-application Consultation on Sizewell C is below:
A 981kb file is is available here and will open in a separate window. It comprises the Parish Council response to the Stage 2 Pre-Application Consultation circulated by EDF Energy in the Autumn of 2016.
SCDC Local Plan 2017 – 2019
The Parish Council have fully participated in the Local Plan consultations undertaken by Suffolk Coastal District Council (now part of the East Suffolk Council).
The response of the Parish Council to each of the three consultative phases can be found below. Each opens in a separate window:
Kelsale Village Centre Conservation Area – 2018
The following two items are provided to record the process outcomes giving rise to the Conservation Area in the centre of Kelsale in November 2018 .
Review of East Suffolk Warding by the Boundaries Commission
The following comments were received regarding the proposals and potentially impacting the outcome for Kelsale cum Carlton.
Kelsale & Yoxford Warding Proposal
52] We received four submissions relating to this area, in addition to general support from the Councils. Kelsale-cum-Carlton Parish Council expressed a general concern over the size of the proposed ward and stated that their links lie more with the Saxmundham area; however, no alternative warding pattern was provided here.
53] A local resident opposed the draft recommendations in this area, stating that Walpole, Cratfield and Linstead should be included in a Halesworth ward, and that Leiston should be included in Kelsale & Yoxford. However, this proposal would have significant knock-on effects on the surrounding wards, and no evidence was put forward to justify moving away from the draft recommendations here.
54] A local resident supported the boundaries here but proposed an alternative name of Kelsale & Chediston; however, we are content that the two primary settlements are represented in the name of this ward and are not proposing to alter it. Another local resident queried the eastern boundary of this ward; however, as this follows the parish boundary in the area, we are content to retain this as part of the final recommendations.