Sizewell C EIA Scoping Opinion – June 2019
Statutory Consultees only
|Response||KcC PC Response to the Planning Inspectorate regarding considerations for their Scoping Opinion to EDF Energy on the requirements of an Environmental Impact Analysis [EIA]||565kb|
|Appendix||Joint SCC & SCDC response to the previous 2014 EIA Scoping Opinion request||1mb|
Sizewell C Stage 3 Consultation – Closed
Stage 3 Consultation ended on 29th March 2019
|KcC PC response to Sizewell Stage 3 Consultation|
|Summary||Executive Summary outlining the position of KCC Parish Council||611kb|
|Response||KcC PC detailed response to Sizewell Stage 3 Consultation – Mar-19||2mb|
|Appendix A||Indicative traffic maps showing morning peak along the A12||2mb|
|Appendix B||Indicative traffic maps showing evening peak along the A12||4mb|
|Appendix C||Response analysis of KcC resident survey||538kb|
|Appendix D||KcC resident survey ‘concerns heatmap’||560kb|
|Appendix E||KcC Sizewell C Public Meeting – 6th Feb-19||3mb|
|Appendix F||KcC resident survey verbatim comments – Mar-19||2mb|
|Appendix G||Reference materials used in compiling the response||529kb|
|Appendix H||Ministry of Transport response to Traffic Analysis Question||158kb|
|KcC Resident Questionnaire – Sizewell Stage 3 Consultation
|KcC Survey Response||KcC Sizewell C Stage 3 – Resident questionnaire response – Mar-19||559kb|
|KcC Survey Comments||KcC Sizewell C Stage 3 – Resident verbatim comments – Mar-19||2mb|
|Sizewell C||KcC PC Sizewell C Public Meeting Presentation Slides – Feb-19||3mb|
|Sizewell C Stage 2||KcC PC response to Sizewell Stage 2 Consultation – Jan-17||981kb|
SCDC Local Plan – Closed
|KcC PC Response 2019||KcC PC response to the SCDC’s Final Draft Local Plan Consultation Jan-19||1mb|
|KcC PC Response 2018||KcC PC response to the SCDC’s First Draft Local Plan Consultation Sep-18||721k|
|KcC PC Response 2017||KcC PC response to the SCDC’s Local Plan Consultation Oct-17||2223k|
Conservation area – Closed
Click below to access the Kelsale Conservation Area Appraisal
Click below for a map of the Kelsale Conservation Area at inception.
Other – Closed
Review of East Suffolk Warding by the Boundaries Commission
The following comments were received regarding the proposals and potentially impacting the outcome for Kelsale cum Carlton.
Kelsale & Yoxford Warding Proposal
52 We received four submissions relating to this area, in addition to general support from the Councils. Kelsale-cum-Carlton Parish Council expressed a general concern over the size of the proposed ward and stated that their links lie more with the Saxmundham area; however, no alternative warding pattern was provided here.
53 A local resident opposed the draft recommendations in this area, stating that Walpole, Cratfield and Linstead should be included in a Halesworth ward, and that Leiston should be included in Kelsale & Yoxford. However, this proposal would have significant knock-on effects on the surrounding wards, and no evidence was put forward to justify moving away from the draft recommendations here.
54 A local resident supported the boundaries here but proposed an alternative name of Kelsale & Chediston; however, we are content that the two primary settlements are represented in the name of this ward and are not proposing to alter it. Another local resident queried the eastern boundary of this ward; however, as this follows the parish boundary in the area, we are content to retain this as part of the final recommendations.
The file below describes the Warding agreed in Parliament